The Differences Slavery Made: A Close Analysis of Two American Communities

Soil Types

Augusta was larger by a factor of 22 percent, but it contained a higher percentage of land poorly suited for agricultural purposes.

Franklin Soil Types
Soil Type Suitability for Agriculture Total Area, in square miles Area as a percent of whole county
Hagerstown-Duffield high suitability 230.81 30.2
Highfield-Glenville good suitability 7.72 1.0
Murrill-Laidig suitable 68.22 8.9
Weikert-Berks-Bedington suitable 235.02 30.7
Laidig-Buchanan poor suitability 166.09 21.7
Dekalb-Laidig not suitable 56.91 7.4
County Total 764.76 99.9



Augusta Soil Types
Soil Type Suitability for Agriculture Total Area, in square miles Area as a percent of whole county
Types 1 - 3 good suitability 409.1 42.0
Types 11 - 14 good suitability 160.32 16.5
Type 4 suitable 43.28 4.4
Types 5 - 10 poor suitability 361.35 37.1
Unidentified 0.20 0.0002
County total 974.05 100



The data are based on the GIS of Augusta and Franklin households--maps are derived from a D. H. Davison map of Franklin County, published in 1858, and a Jedediah Hotchkiss map of Augusta County, published in 1870, and based on surveys completed "during the war." The maps have been georeferenced at the Virginia Center for Digital History, using ESRI Arc Info to produce a Geographic Information Systems map and database of households based on U.S. census data from the population, agricultural, and slaveowners' schedules.

Edward L. Ayers and William G. Thomas, III
Soil Types
2001.

Points of Analysis to this Data:

"Slaveholders in Augusta did not monopolize the best soil nor did they crowd out nonslaveholders or small slaveholders."

"On a per capita basis, Franklin farmers grew far less corn and more wheat than their counterparts in Augusta, and their commitment to wheat was seen by many as both the symbol of the North's wealth and the evidence of its superior labor system."


Citation: Key = E146
Historiography Tools