"In the case of history, a discipline where the crisis in scholarly publishing is particularly acute, the attraction of an
e-book should be especially appealing. Any historian who has done long stints of research knows the frustration over his or
her inability to communicate the fathomlessness of the archives and the bottomlessness of the past. If only my reader could
have a look inside this box, you say to yourself, at all the letters in it, not just the lines from the letter I am quoting.
If only I could follow that trail in my text just as I pursued it through the dossiers, when I felt free to take detours leading
away from my main subject. If only I could show how themes crisscross outside my narrative and extend far beyond the boundaries
of my book. Not that books should be exempt from the imperative of trimming a narrative down to a graceful shape. But instead
of using an argument to close a case, they could open up new ways of making sense of the evidence, new possibilities of making
available the raw material embedded in the story, a new consciousness of the complexities involved in construing the past."
"I am not advocating the sheer accumulation of data, or arguing for links to databanks--so-called hyperlinks. These can amount
to little more than an elaborate form of footnoting. Instead of bloating the electronic book, I think it possible to structure
it in layers arranged like a pyramid. The top layer could be a concise account of the subject, available perhaps in paperback.
The next layer could contain expanded versions of different aspects of the argument, not arranged sequentially as in a narrative,
but rather as self-contained units that feed into the topmost story. The third layer could be composed of documentation, possibly
of different kinds, each set off by interpretative essays. A fourth layer might be theoretical or historiographical, with
selections from previous scholarship and discussions of them. A fifth layer could be pedagogic, consisting of suggestions
for classroom discussion and a model syllabus. And a sixth layer could contain readers' reports, exchanges between the author
and the editor, and letters from readers, who could provide a growing corpus of commentary as the book made its way through
different groups of readers."