Films & Summaries : Return to Index
|
|
Interview with Dr. Robert D. Meads
|
|
Dr. Meads considered the January 9, 1956 referendum on Section 141 of the Virginia
Constitution a waste of time and energy and potentially enormously disruptive to
Virginia schools and "our good race relations." He called the tuition plan
"unconstitutional." Meads alluded to a "recent tip" from a Department of Justice
official that the U.S. Supreme Court would consider the plan unconstitutional and
immediately dismiss it. Meads was also concerned that Virginia might lose $16 million in
federal education funding. Worried about "fly by night" schools and the hemmoraging of
teachers from schools, Meads argued clearly that the disruption to the public education
system would jeapordize business and the future of the Commonwealth. Meads also
criticized the Virginia brief to the Supreme Court in the school cases which called the
black race "immoral and diseased." Meads stated that such categorical descriptions were
ungentlemanly and wrong. "We are all Americans," Meads said, "We are all equal in the
sight of the Lord." Meads did not believe that "the average Virginian" wanted to
denigrate blacks with sweeping racist statements. Meads replied directly to Dr. Dabney
Lancaster, "the director of the information center for the Gray Amendment forces." Meads
responded to Lancaster's comments (December 19th) that school buildings might be sold in
the privatization of local education. Meads considered this a fire sale of the state's
most valuable resources and argued that it would "bankrupt" the Commonwealth.
|
|
|
|
About the film
|
This film is indexed under the following terms:
|
Copyright William G. Thomas, III and Rector and Board of Visitors, University of Virginia.
All Rights Reserved. 2005. No film, image, or text on this site may be reproduced, copied, or duplicated for, any purpose whatsoever, without the express written permission from the rights holders. See our copyright statement. |
|